All religions of God and humanisms agree about the rights of
mankind. However, the opinions of some people around the world differ about the
method of how it should be done. It is stated in the authentic books of faith
in the meaning of "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth". However,
some people argue to end this rule that people should not think about returning
the oppression because in their view this will increase the war rate. If this
will increase the war rate then why people now are killing each other easily and
often the ones with more weapons or are taking advantage of this and oppress. When
criminals will have nothing to fear from that will lead them to more crimes. If
the authority will not make rights for those who got oppressed and put some
fair methods of punishment, they actually contradict their theory for human
rights! When a criminal for example murders someone or steal his house, is it
fair to not ask the oppressed person if he wants to forgive that
criminal or not? Then if he wants to forgive him with money or without, this actually depends on his decision.
In Islam if the rulers were just, they will study the crime case first from all
sides and follow the conditions about each specific crime, then apply the penalty.
However, it's recommended by God for a Muslim to forgive the person who done
the crime for the best reward from God. Moreover, our religion has presreved our blood, self, money, mind and honor. Kesas in Islam which is slaughtering
the criminal from his nick, is the best method for execution because it is a
faster way to kill the criminal and not make him suffer much pain.
No comments:
Post a Comment